July 24th, 1857 - Hawthorne's first visit to the Art Treasures exhibition

 

Art Treasures Exhibition

July 24th, 1857 — First visit

Day before yesterday [from journal of 26th July, hence visited on 24 July, 1857] we went to the Arts’ Exhibition, of which I do not think that I have a great deal to say. The edifice, being built more for convenience than show, appears better in the interior than from without, — long vaulted vistas, lighted from above, extending far away, all hung with pictures; and, on the floor below, statues, knights in armor, cabinets, vases, and all manner of curious and beautiful things, in a regular arrangement. 

Sir Thomas Fairbairn handing over the address to Prince Albert, by Louis Haigh, 1857

Scatter five thousand people through the scene, and I do not know how to make a better outline sketch.

I was unquiet, from a hopelessness of being able to enjoy it fully. Nothing is more depressing to me than the sight of a great many pictures together; it is like having innumerable books open before you at once, and being able to read only a sentence or two in each. They bedazzle one another with cross lights. There never should be more than one picture in a room, nor more than one picture to be studied in one day. 

Photo of the Modern Painters room by Philip Delamotte (who took the photograph of Nathaniel Hawthorne in Oxford, in September 1856)

Galleries of pictures are surely the greatest absurdities that ever were contrived, there being no excuse for them, except that it is the only way in which pictures can be made generally available and accessible. 

We went first into the Gallery of British Painters, where there were hundreds of pictures, every one of which would have interested me by itself; but I could not fix my mind on one more than another, so I wandered about, to get a general idea of the Exhibition. 

Victoria and Albert visit the Art Treasures Exhibition 1857

We went first into the Gallery of British Painters, where there were hundreds of pictures, every one of which would have interested me by itself; but I could not fix my mind on one more than another, so I wandered about, to get a general idea of the Exhibition.

Truly it is very fine; truly, also, every great show is a kind of humbug.

There were an average of 9,000 visitors every day

I doubt whether there were half a dozen people there who got the kind of enjoyment that it was intended to create, — very respectable people they seemed to be, and very well behaved, but all skimming the surface, as I did, and none of them so feeding on what was beautiful as to digest it, and make it a part of themselves.

Such a quantity of objects must be utterly rejected before you can get any real profit from one!

It seemed like throwing away time to look twice even at whatever was most precious; and it was dreary to think of not fully enjoying this collection, the very flower of Time, which never bloomed before, and never, by any possibility, can bloom again.


Viewed hastily, moreover, it is somewhat sad to think that mankind, after centuries of cultivation of the beautiful arts, can produce no more splendid spectacle than this. It is not so very grand, although, poor as it is, I lack capacity to take in even the whole of it.

What gave me most pleasure (because it required no trouble nor study to come at the heart of it) were the individual relics of antiquity, of which there are some very curious ones in the cases ranged along the principal saloon or nave of the building.

For example, the dagger with which Felton killed the Duke of Buckingham, — a knife with a bone handle and a curved blade, not more than three inches long; sharp-pointed, murderous-looking, but of very coarse manufacture.

[John Felton (c. 1595 – 29 November 1628) was a lieutenant in the English Army who stabbed George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham to death in the Greyhound Pub of Portsmouth on 23 August 1628. 
King Charles I trusted Buckingham, who made himself rich in the process but proved a failure at foreign and military policy. Charles gave him command of the military expedition against Spain in 1625. It was a total fiasco with many dying from disease and starvation. He led another disastrous military campaign in 1627. Buckingham was hated and the damage to the king's reputation was irreparable. Buckingham's assassination by Felton was widely celebrated by members of the public in England, even after his execution]

Fernando Álvarez de Toledo, III Duque de Alba, by AntonioMoro
with what looks like a staff of iron

Also, the Duke of Alva’s leading staff of iron; and the target of the Emperor Charles V., which seemed to be made of hardened leather, with designs artistically engraved upon it, and gilt.

The National Portrait Gallery identifies 22 portraits of Thomas Wolsey

.

I saw Wolsey’s portrait, and, in close proximity to it, his veritable cardinal’s hat in a richly ornamented glass case, on which was an inscription to the effect that it had been bought by Charles Kean at the sale of Horace Walpole’s collection. 

Cardinal Wolsey's hat on show in Ipswich, 2023

It is a felt hat with a brim about six inches wide all round, and a rather high crown; the color was, doubtless, a bright red originally, but now it is mottled with a grayish hue, and there are cracks in the brim, as if the hat had seen a good deal of wear.

The signet ring of one of the Pharaohs, now in the British Museum
Solid gold signet-ring. The bezel bears a representation of a squatting child-king, wearing a pleated garment, bag-wig and adorned with a uraeus. The king sits above the hieroglyphic signs for "Lord of the Two Lands", a standard royal epithet. He holds a large feather, symbol of Maat, with a long Shu-feather behind him and an ankh-sign before him. Above him is a sun-disc, flanked by two cobras. The slouching form of this figure, with wide hips, suggests the style of Akhenaten, who maybe the king represented here.

I suppose a far greater curiosity than this is the signet-ring of one of the Pharaohs, who reigned over Egypt during Joseph’s prime ministry, — a large ring to be worn on the thumb, if at all, — of massive gold, seal part and all, and inscribed with some characters that looked like Hebrew. I had seen this before in Mr. Mayer’s collection in Liverpool.

This chain is still worn by the Lord Mayor of London on ceremonial occasions

The mediaeval and English relics, however, interested me more, — such as the golden and enamelled George worn by Sir Thomas More

What is a George? A misreading of Hawthorne’s awful handwriting? Should this read Chain or Cross?


or the embroidered shirt of Charles I., — the very one, I presume, which he wore at his execution. There are no blood-marks on it, it being very nicely washed and folded. The texture of the linen cloth — if linen it be — is coarser than any peasant would wear at this day, but the needlework is exceedingly fine and elaborate.


Another relic of the same period, — the Cavalier General Sir Jacob Astley’s buff-coat, with his belt and sword; the leather of the buff-coat, for I took it between my fingers, is about a quarter of an inch thick, of the same material as a wash-leather glove, and by no means smoothly dressed, though the sleeves are covered with silver-lace.

Maximilian armour, armed with monkey visor, c 1510

Of old armor, there are admirable specimens; and it makes one’s head ache to look at the iron pots which men used to thrust their heads into. Indeed, at one period they seem to have worn an inner iron cap underneath the helmet. I doubt whether there ever was any age of chivalry… . It certainly was no chivalric sentiment that made men case themselves in impenetrable iron, and ride about in iron prisons, fearfully peeping at their enemies through little slits and gimlet-holes. The unprotected breast of a private soldier must have shamed his leaders in those days. The point of honor is very different now.

I mean to go again and again, many times more, and will take each day some one department, and so endeavor to get some real use and improvement out of what I see. Much that is most valuable must be immitigably rejected; but something, according to the measure of my poor capacity, will really be taken into my mind. 

After all, it was an agreeable day, and I think the next one will be more so.

Nathaniel Hawthorne
Old Trafford
July 26th, 1857

Comments